Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Hemel results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,984 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Hemel is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Brandon Hemel
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
18.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos