Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Fellows results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 144.502 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,720 of 27,710 speakers). This Brandon Fellows is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Brandon Fellows
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
62.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 84.8%84.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 84.8%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos