Author summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 2,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlo Versano results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,762 hits . Analysis detected 8,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,958 of 6,628 authors). This Carlo Versano is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Carlo Versano
Author details
Total words: 9,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst