Speaker summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 279.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brady Ishiwata Williams results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 56 hits . Analysis detected 501.116 faulty-reasoning hits from 279.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,911 of 28,364 speakers). This Brady Ishiwata Williams is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Brady Ishiwata Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 279.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos279.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst