Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video52.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Schoenfeld results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,468 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Schoenfeld is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Brad Schoenfeld
Speaker details
Total words: 52.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos