Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boerner results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Boerner is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Boerner
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.5%52.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos