Author summary
27%1 analyzed article/video1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosanna Xia results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 2,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,344 of 6,461 authors). This Rosanna Xia is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Rosanna Xia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
33%Rosanna Xia (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,168
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos