Speaker summary
76%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Pauley results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 100.5 hits. Analysis detected 385.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,833 of 28,364 speakers). This Bob Pauley is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Bob Pauley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos