Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Morgan results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 532 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (12,124 of 28,364 speakers). This Bob Morgan is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Bob Morgan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
38.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos