Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Carey results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 61.333 hits. Analysis detected 245.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,882 of 28,364 speakers). This Bob Carey is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Bob Carey
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
40.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos