Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Board of Peace official results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (490 of 28,364 speakers). This Board of Peace official is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Board of Peace official
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos