Speaker summary
ā 99%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BLIS Collective results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 99% (481 of 28,364 speakers). This BLIS Collective is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
BLIS Collective
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 99%BLIS Collective (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos