Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatima B. Jalloh results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 4,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,161 of 6,170 authors). This Fatima B. Jalloh is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Fatima B. Jalloh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠65%Fatima B. Jalloh (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos