Speaker summary
⁠58%3 analyzed articles/videos59.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Melugin results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 119.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,168 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Melugin is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Bill Melugin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
51.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos59.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.9%57.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos