Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Aubrey results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 72.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,598 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Aubrey is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Bill Aubrey
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
37.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 36.2%36.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.2%36.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos