Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video151.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Betsy Coffia results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Red Herring, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 83.559 hits. Analysis detected 451.878 faulty-reasoning hits from 151.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,870 of 28,364 speakers). This Betsy Coffia is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Betsy Coffia
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 151.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
36.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos151.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 47.2%47.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.6%54.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.7%19.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 47.2%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos