Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Skwarecki results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 71.8% saturation with 60.308 hits. Analysis detected 279.308 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,194 of 28,364 speakers). This Beth Skwarecki is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Beth Skwarecki
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
43.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 71.8%71.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 43.6%43.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 71.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos