Speaker summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Miller results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 112.591 hits . Analysis detected 1,288.52 faulty-reasoning hits from 447 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (24,632 of 27,524 speakers). This Beth Miller is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Beth Miller
Speaker details
Total words: 447
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 9.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos447 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst