Speaker summary
ā 82%1 analyzed article/video65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Remy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.8% and a BS Rank of ā 61% (11,271 of 28,364 speakers). This Benjamin Remy is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Benjamin Remy
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 61%Benjamin Remy (selected)43%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
42.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos65 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos