Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video287.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Gideon results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 127.635 hits. Analysis detected 852.315 faulty-reasoning hits from 287.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,328 of 28,364 speakers). This Benjamin Gideon is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Benjamin Gideon
Speaker details
Total words: 287.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
16.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos287.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.0%29.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos