Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Acevedo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 893 hits. Analysis detected 3,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (535 of 6,235 authors). This Nicole Acevedo is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Nicole Acevedo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
92%Nicole Acevedo (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,166
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510091.4% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 41.2%41.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 20.2%20.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.6%18.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.7%6.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Author 41.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Author 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 20.2%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos