Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Auerbach results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 76.5 hits. Analysis detected 137.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,068 of 28,268 speakers). This Benjamin Auerbach is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Benjamin Auerbach
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
59.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.9%44.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos