Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benetti results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 183 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,703 of 28,364 speakers). This Benetti is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Benetti
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠45%Benetti (selected)28%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
27.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos110 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 48.2%48.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 48.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos