John Kruk will be forced back into a suit by NBC as Phillies go national this weekend 7%

By Rob Tornoe6%

7/24/2026, 5:58:48 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 918 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,108 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,492 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the article peer group.

The Phillies have lost two straight series, but fans will have at least one thing to look forward to this weekend  John Kruk in a suit. 
The former Phillies first baseman turned TV analyst will be back in the booth for NBC to cover the series finale against the New York Yankees on <i>Sunday Night Baseball</i>. 
That means Kruk will once again ditch his polo shirt and ball cap to meet NBC’s rigorous broadcast standards. 
“We’re a coat-and-tie shop, so somebody does forcibly make him wear the suit,” said Jason Benetti, the voice of NBC’s <i>Sunday Night Baseball</i>, who will be calling the game alongside Kruk and former Phillies manager Joe Girardi. 
If the past is any indicator, expect social media to have fun with Kruk’s attire. 
This is the third Phillies game he’s called for NBC this season (though the first was a Peacock exclusive), and each time fans have cracked jokes. 
One thought Kruk looked like “a clean-shaven Benjamin Franklin.” 
Others joked he “legit looks like a Mafia hit man” or like a “washed-up hockey coach who tries to make a comeback after years of heavy drinking.” 
“Some local place should give him a suit deal, and they should let him gift it to charity,” Benetti said. 
Even Tom McCarthy’s gotten in on the fun. 
Following June’s NBC game, McCarthy suggested they send Kruk’s suit to Cooperstown, N.Y., to be part of the National Baseball Hall of Fame. 
Earlier this week, Kruk mentioned he might need to borrow a tie for Sunday, so McCarthy brought in a bunch of his own for his broadcast partner to pick from. 
“I believe he is going with one of the ones I brought him,” McCarthy said. 
“The whole exchange has been great.” 
Kruk didn’t have a specific color in mind  he just wanted “something that pops” that went well with his dark blue suit. 
“I mean, I look good in everything,” Kruk said on the broadcast Sunday during the Phillies’ loss to the New York Mets, though he questioned why he needs to wear a suit in the first place. 
This is NBC’s first season broadcasting <i>Sunday Night Baseball</i>, which it took over from ESPN as part of a three-year TV deal with MLB that reportedly runs about $200 million a season. 
While Benetti is the play-by-play voice, he is joined each week by two different analysts linked to the teams playing. 
Benetti has called two games with Kruk this season, describing him as “the perfect improv partner.” 
But the depth of Kruk’s baseball knowledge took Benetti a bit by surprise. 
“I went in with this notion he’ll say anything, and it’ll be interesting, intriguing, weird  the whole range of creativity,” Benetti. said. 
“But he’s an absolutely astute, perceptive, issue-spotting baseball analyst.” 
Phillies back on Apple TV to kick off Yankees series 
Before we get to see Kruk back in his suit, fans will have to log onto Apple TV to watch the Phillies-Yankees series opener on <i>Friday Night Baseball</i>. 
First pitch is scheduled for 6 p.m. 
Friday, with Jesus Luzardo on the mound facing Yankees ace Cam Schlittler. 
Calling the game is Wayne Randazzo alongside one-time Phillies pitcher Dontrelle Willis. 
Heidi Watney will report live from Citizens Bank Park. 
Despite the annoyances that come with being forced to stream a Phillies game, Apple TV has the best feature of any sports streamer  the ability to switch to an audio feed of your team’s radio announcing crew. 
So Phillies fans can listen to Scott Franzke and Larry Andersen, no synching required. 
It’s the fifth season of Apple TV’s seven-year, $595 million deal with MLB, which runs through the 2028 season. 
Over that time, the cost has nearly doubled from $6.99 to $12.99 a month, though Apple TV is offering a free one-month trial and this is the last Phillies game scheduled to stream on the tech giant’s platform. 
Saturday’s game will be back on NBC Sports Philadelphia, with McCarthy calling the action alongside former Phillies general manager Rubén Amaro Jr. 
Citizens Bank Park gets high marks from Benetti 
In addition to being the voice of <i>Sunday Night Baseball</i>, Benetti calls Detroit Tigers games for Detroit SportsNet. 
Prior to that, he spent eight seasons as the TV voice of the Chicago White Sox. 
There isn’t a stadium in the majors Benetti hasn’t called a game from. 
And Citizens Bank Park, where he’ll be Sunday night, is near the top of his lists of the best ballparks. 
“It’s top three in the league,” Benetti said. 
“It’s absolutely wired. 
When it’s close and late, you can’t hear yourself... 
The ballpark itself plays loud.” 
Benetti is also a fan of the food served to media folks. 
He described the ice cream dished out by “Frankie Two Scoops” as “the best in the league,” and is still angry he only recently learned about the terrific cheesesteaks the team serves inside the visiting team clubhouse. 
“It was an 11 out of 10,” Benetti said. 
“It was nonsense how good it was.” 
Phillies standings 
Phillies news 
Phillies owner John Middleton on the trade deadline, firing Rob Thomson, and Dave Dombrowski’s future. 
Columnist David Murphy highlights two players who could help the Phillies address their biggest trade deadline need. 
Alex McFarlane was impressive in his major league debut dealing with the top of the Los Angeles Dodgers’ lineup. 
If you missed it, check out the cool threads the Phillies will wear in next month’s Field of Dreams game. 
Upcoming Phillies TV schedule 
<b>Yankees at Phillies</b> 
<b>Game 1:</b> Friday, July 24, 6:40 p.m. 
(Apple TV) 
<b>Game 2:</b> Saturday, July 25, 6:05 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 3:</b> Sunday, July 26, 7:20 p.m. 
(NBC) 
<b>Phillies at Marlins</b> 
<b>Game 1:</b> Monday, July 27, 6:40 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 2:</b> Tuesday, July 28, 6:40 p.m.( 
NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 3:</b> Wednesday, July 29, 12:10 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Phillies at Orioles </b> 
<b>Game 1:</b> Friday, July 31, 7:05 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 2:</b> Saturday, Aug. 1, 7:05 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 3:</b> Sunday, Aug. 2, 12:10 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Nationals at Phillies</b> 
<b>Game 1:</b> Monday, Aug. 3, 6:40 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 2: </b>Tuesday, Aug. 4, 6:40 p.m.( 
NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 3:</b> Wednesday, Aug. 5, 6:40 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 4:</b> Thursday, Aug. 6, 6:05 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Blue Jays at Phillies</b> 
<b>Game 1: </b>Friday, Aug. 7, 6:40 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 2:</b> Saturday, Aug. 8, 6:05 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
<b>Game 3:</b> Sunday, Aug. 9, 1:35 p.m. 
(NBC Sports Philadelphia) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Rob Tornoe: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Rob Tornoe: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 6.7%Rob Tornoe: 3.4%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 3.4%Rob Tornoe: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion3.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Rob Tornoe: 2.4%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Rob Tornoe: 5.3%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias12.5%This article: 2.1%Rob Tornoe: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Rob Tornoe: 2.5%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Rob Tornoe: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias4.2%This article: 2.1%Rob Tornoe: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.4%Rob Tornoe: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority1.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.1%Rob Tornoe: 3.0%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.5%Rob Tornoe: 3.5%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal10.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Rob Tornoe: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground3.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.3%Rob Tornoe: 2.2%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote3.3%This article: 3.2%Rob Tornoe: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Tornoe: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Rob Tornoe: 2.7%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.1%

1108 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers20%attributed speech884writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJason Benetti • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJason Benetti • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMcCarthy • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMcCarthy • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kruk • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 37 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBenetti • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Benetti

85%flagged-word coverage
110 attributed words49% of attributed speech36% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%Benetti: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Benetti: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.