Speaker summary
55%1 analyzed article/video323.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Shuldiner results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 960.103 faulty-reasoning hits from 323.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,555 of 27,983 speakers). This Ben Shuldiner is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Ben Shuldiner
Speaker details
Total words: 323.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos323.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.9%29.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos