Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos69.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Hodges results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 86.9% saturation with 75.151 hits. Analysis detected 219.151 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,398 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Hodges is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Ben Hodges
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
37.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos69.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.9%86.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.5%25.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos