Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben & Jerry’s results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 357 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,510 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben & Jerry’s is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Ben & Jerry’s
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos