Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belinda Escobosa results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 144.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,501 of 28,364 speakers). This Belinda Escobosa is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Belinda Escobosa
Speaker details
Total words: 52.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos