Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becky Chen results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 56.314 hits. Analysis detected 329.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,889 of 28,364 speakers). This Becky Chen is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Becky Chen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
22.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.7%23.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.7%23.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos