Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Wong results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 2,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,973 of 6,316 authors). This Jessica Wong is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Jessica Wong
Author details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst