Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beck, Amsden, and Stalpes results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,504 of 28,364 speakers). This Beck, Amsden, and Stalpes is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Beck, Amsden, and Stalpes
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 64.3%64.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos