Speaker summary
ā 38%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becca Rothfeld results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (8,055 of 26,884 speakers). This Becca Rothfeld is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Becca Rothfeld
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 70%Becca Rothfeld (selected)50%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Liberalism, Heal Thyselfā 38%
Persuasionā 37%By Marlene Laruelleā 50%7/14/2026, 3:55:06 PM