Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bear results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 518 faulty-reasoning hits from 457 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,967 of 28,364 speakers). This Bear is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Bear
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 457
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
22.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos457 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 47.3%47.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.3%47.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 47.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos