Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bayes appeared appalled results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Indoctrination, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 70.3% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (8,527 of 37,373 speakers). This Bayes appeared appalled is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Bayes appeared appalled
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠78%Bayes appeared appalled (selected)63%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
62.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.7%29.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Burden of Proof: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos