Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos126.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barry Manilow results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 352.505 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,999 of 28,364 speakers). This Barry Manilow is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Barry Manilow
Speaker details
Total words: 126.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
18.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos126.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.3%40.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.0%29.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos