Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Velline results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 215.737 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,449 of 28,364 speakers). This Barbara Velline is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Barbara Velline
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
37.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 47.7%47.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 47.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos