Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bao Wenzhong results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 86.9% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 140.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Bao Wenzhong is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Bao Wenzhong
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠62%Bao Wenzhong (selected)46%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
45.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.9%86.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos