Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Balochistan Human Rights Group results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 269.778 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,388 of 28,364 speakers). This Balochistan Human Rights Group is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Balochistan Human Rights Group
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
37.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 32.9%32.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.5%28.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos