Speaker summary
⁠49%6 analyzed articles/videos183.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AWS results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 645 faulty-reasoning hits from 183.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,241 of 28,364 speakers). This AWS is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
AWS
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 183.333
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
18.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos183.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.2%50.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 5.8%5.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos