Speaker summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 289.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Mosier results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 721.158 faulty-reasoning hits from 289.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,923 of 28,364 speakers). This Austin Mosier is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Austin Mosier
Speaker details
Total words: 289.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 13.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos289.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 35.4% 35.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 32.8% 32.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst