Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video95.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Augusto Romero results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 456.037 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,067 of 26,656 speakers). This Augusto Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Augusto Romero
Speaker details
Total words: 95.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
66.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos95.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 85.2%85.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 67.6%67.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.2%35.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 85.2%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 67.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Despite the 3-2 Defeat⁠70%
L.A. TACO⁠85%By Ivan Fernandez⁠54%7/12/2026, 12:25:53 AM