Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General's Office results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,428 of 28,364 speakers). This Attorney General's Office is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Attorney General's Office
Speaker details
Total words: 213
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
23.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos213 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos