Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atomic Energy Agency of Iran results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 310.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,132 of 28,364 speakers). This Atomic Energy Agency of Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Atomic Energy Agency of Iran
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
59.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos