Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asia Russell results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51% saturation with 76.5 hits. Analysis detected 412.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,076 of 28,364 speakers). This Asia Russell is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Asia Russell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠51%Asia Russell (selected)33%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
32.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos150 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.0%51.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 34.0%34.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 16.0%16.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.0%34.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos