Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (320 of 28,364 speakers). This ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos