Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video127.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arturo Gaona results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 127.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (21,180 of 26,828 speakers). This Arturo Gaona is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Arturo Gaona
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 127.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos127.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos