Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video16.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artak Avagyan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 16.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,405 of 28,364 speakers). This Artak Avagyan is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Artak Avagyan
Speaker details
Total words: 16.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos