Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Art Thiel results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,256 of 28,364 speakers). This Art Thiel is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Art Thiel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
26.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos