Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arlene DiLorenzo results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,200 of 28,364 speakers). This Arlene DiLorenzo is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Arlene DiLorenzo
Speaker details
Total words: 224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
13.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos224 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos