Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arifa Noor results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Circular Reasoning, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 47.25 hits. Analysis detected 125.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,468 of 28,364 speakers). This Arifa Noor is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Arifa Noor
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
28.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.9%38.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.1%11.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 19.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos